The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Command R+ vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Command R+ and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview are closely matched at -0.1 and -5.2 on the LLM Stats Score.

Cohere · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Command R+ and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at -0.1 and -5.2.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Command R+ wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Command R+

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Command R+
Cohere
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-0.1
#311
-5.2
#342
Reasoning
-0.4
#307
-5.3
#332
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
$0.25 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Command R+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Math
-1.7#298
-5.4#308
Finance
1.7#177
-3.3#197
Legal
1.7#166
-3.3#183
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Command R+ · 12 for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

3 shared

Command R+ outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GSM8k, MMLU), while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is better at 1 benchmark (TruthfulQA).

Command R+ shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Sep 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

97.0B diff

Command R+ has 97.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview, making it 1385.7% larger.

Cohere
Command R+
104.0Bparameters
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
104.0B
Command R+
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Command R+ specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Command R+ specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is 8 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

2.0 years ago

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.3 years ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command R+ and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command R+
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Which is better, Command R+ or IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Command R+ and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at -0.1 and -5.2. Command R+ is made by Cohere and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Command R+ compare to IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview in benchmarks?

Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Command R+ and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Command R+ supports 128K tokens and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command R+ and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.1 vs -5.2), licensing (CC BY-NC vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command R+ and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Command R+ is developed by Cohere and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM.

Related comparisons