Model Comparison

Command R+ vs Grok-1.5Which is better in 2026?

Grok-1.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Command R+ vs Grok-1.5 — which is better?

Command R+ (by Cohere) and Grok-1.5 (by xAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Command R+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Grok-1.5 is better at 2 benchmarks (GSM8k, MMLU). Grok-1.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Command R+ if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Grok-1.5 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Command R+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Grok-1.5 is better at 2 benchmarks (GSM8k, MMLU).

Grok-1.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Command R+ specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Command R+ specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
xAI
Grok-1.5
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while Grok-1.5 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Grok-1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while Grok-1.5 was released on 2024-03-28.

Command R+ is 5 months newer than Grok-1.5.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

1.8 years ago

5mo newer
Grok-1.5

Mar 28, 2024

2.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Has open weights
Higher GSM8k score (90.0% vs 70.7%)
Higher MMLU score (81.3% vs 75.7%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
Command R+
xAI
Grok-1.5

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs Grok-1.5.

Which is better, Command R+ or Grok-1.5?

Grok-1.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Command R+ is made by Cohere and Grok-1.5 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Command R+ compare to Grok-1.5 in benchmarks?

Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. Grok-1.5 scores GSM8k: 90.0%, DocVQA: 85.6%, MMLU: 81.3%, HumanEval: 74.1%, MMMU: 53.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Command R+ and Grok-1.5?

Command R+ supports 128K tokens and Grok-1.5 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command R+ and Grok-1.5?

Key differences include licensing (CC BY-NC vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command R+ and Grok-1.5?

Command R+ is developed by Cohere and Grok-1.5 is developed by xAI.