The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Command R+ vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 leads the LLM Stats Score 13.6 to -0.2.

Cohere · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 13.6 to -0.2, ranking #232 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Command R+

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output

Choose Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 13.6 and ranks #232 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Command R+
Cohere
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-0.2
#315
13.6
#232
Reasoning
-0.5
#310
13.7
#225
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.25 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Command R+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Math
-1.7#299
11.9#229
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Command R+ · 7 for Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

No common benchmarks found

Command R+ and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

54.1B diff

Command R+ has 54.1B more parameters than Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1, making it 108.4% larger.

Cohere
Command R+
104.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
49.9Bparameters
104.0B
Command R+
49.9B
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Command R+ specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Command R+ specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
NVIDIA
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 uses Llama 3.1 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 was released on 2025-03-18.

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is 7 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

2.0 years ago

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Mar 18, 2025

1.5 years ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Command R+'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Command R+'s cutoff date.

Command R+

—

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Dec 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command R+ and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command R+
✓ Preferred
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.

Which is better, Command R+ or Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 leads the LLM Stats Score 13.6 to -0.2. Command R+ is made by Cohere and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Command R+ compare to Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 in benchmarks?

Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 scores MATH-500: 96.6%, MT-Bench: 91.7%, MBPP: 91.3%, Arena Hard: 88.3%, BFCL v2: 73.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Command R+ and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

Command R+ supports 128K tokens and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command R+ and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.2 vs 13.6), licensing (CC BY-NC vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command R+ and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

Command R+ is developed by Cohere and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons