The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Command R+ vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to -0.5.

Cohere · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.7 to -0.5, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Command R+

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.7 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Command R+
Cohere
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-0.5
#331
45.7
#29
Reasoning
-0.8
#326
43.2
#42
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.25 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000
—

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Command R+ · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

No common benchmarks found

Command R+ and MiMo-V2.6-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

205.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 205.0B more parameters than Command R+, making it 197.1% larger.

Cohere
Command R+
104.0Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
104.0B
Command R+
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Command R+ specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Command R+ specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Command R+ does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Command R+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 25 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

2.1 years ago

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

2.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command R+ and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command R+
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Which is better, Command R+ or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to -0.5. Command R+ is made by Cohere and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Command R+ compare to MiMo-V2.6-Flash in benchmarks?

Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Command R+ and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Command R+ supports 128K tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command R+ and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.5 vs 45.7), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (CC BY-NC vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command R+ and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Command R+ is developed by Cohere and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons