Make AI phone calls with one API call

Start for free

Model Comparison

Command R+ vs Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Mistral Small 3 24B Base significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Command R+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Mistral Small 3 24B Base is better at 3 benchmarks (ARC-C, GSM8k, MMLU).

Mistral Small 3 24B Base significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

CallingBox

Done comparing? Ship the phone agent.

One API for outbound and inbound calls.

Start for freeRead the docs
$0.05 /min all-in7 lines of code

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 23 2026 • llm-stats.com
Cohere
Command R+
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerCohere
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

80.4B diff

Command R+ has 80.4B more parameters than Mistral Small 3 24B Base, making it 340.7% larger.

Cohere
Command R+
104.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
23.6Bparameters
104.0B
Command R+
23.6B
Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Command R+ specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Command R+ specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Apr 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Mistral Small 3 24B Base supports multimodal inputs, whereas Command R+ does not.

Mistral Small 3 24B Base can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Command R+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while Mistral Small 3 24B Base uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while Mistral Small 3 24B Base was released on 2025-01-30.

Mistral Small 3 24B Base is 5 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

1.6 years ago

Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Jan 30, 2025

1.2 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Mistral Small 3 24B Base has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while Command R+'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Mistral Small 3 24B Base's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Command R+'s cutoff date.

Command R+

—

Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Oct 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Cohere
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Mistral AI
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher ARC-C score (91.3% vs 71.0%)
Higher GSM8k score (80.7% vs 70.7%)
Higher MMLU score (80.7% vs 75.7%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
Command R+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Base

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Mistral Small 3 24B Base significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Command R+ is made by Cohere and Mistral Small 3 24B Base is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. Mistral Small 3 24B Base scores ARC-C: 91.3%, GSM8k: 80.7%, MMLU: 80.7%, TriviaQA: 80.3%, MBPP: 69.6%.
Command R+ supports 128K tokens and Mistral Small 3 24B Base supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (CC BY-NC vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Command R+ is developed by Cohere and Mistral Small 3 24B Base is developed by Mistral AI.