Model Comparison

Command R+ vs Mistral Small 3 24B BaseWhich is better in 2026?

Mistral Small 3 24B Base significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Command R+ vs Mistral Small 3 24B Base — which is better?

Command R+ (by Cohere) and Mistral Small 3 24B Base (by Mistral AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Command R+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Mistral Small 3 24B Base is better at 3 benchmarks (ARC-C, GSM8k, MMLU). Mistral Small 3 24B Base significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Command R+ if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output

Choose Mistral Small 3 24B Base if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Command R+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Mistral Small 3 24B Base is better at 3 benchmarks (ARC-C, GSM8k, MMLU).

Mistral Small 3 24B Base significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

80.4B diff

Command R+ has 80.4B more parameters than Mistral Small 3 24B Base, making it 340.7% larger.

Cohere
Command R+
104.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
23.6Bparameters
104.0B
Command R+
23.6B
Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Command R+ specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Command R+ specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Mistral Small 3 24B Base supports multimodal inputs, whereas Command R+ does not.

Mistral Small 3 24B Base can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Command R+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while Mistral Small 3 24B Base uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while Mistral Small 3 24B Base was released on 2025-01-30.

Mistral Small 3 24B Base is 5 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

1.8 years ago

Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Jan 30, 2025

1.3 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Mistral Small 3 24B Base has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while Command R+'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Mistral Small 3 24B Base's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Command R+'s cutoff date.

Command R+

—

Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Oct 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Cohere
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Mistral AI
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher ARC-C score (91.3% vs 71.0%)
Higher GSM8k score (80.7% vs 70.7%)
Higher MMLU score (80.7% vs 75.7%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
Command R+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Base

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs Mistral Small 3 24B Base.

Which is better, Command R+ or Mistral Small 3 24B Base?

Mistral Small 3 24B Base significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Command R+ is made by Cohere and Mistral Small 3 24B Base is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Command R+ compare to Mistral Small 3 24B Base in benchmarks?

Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. Mistral Small 3 24B Base scores ARC-C: 91.3%, GSM8k: 80.7%, MMLU: 80.7%, TriviaQA: 80.3%, MBPP: 69.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Command R+ and Mistral Small 3 24B Base?

Command R+ supports 128K tokens and Mistral Small 3 24B Base supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command R+ and Mistral Small 3 24B Base?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (CC BY-NC vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command R+ and Mistral Small 3 24B Base?

Command R+ is developed by Cohere and Mistral Small 3 24B Base is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons