The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Command R+ vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Command R+ and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct are closely matched at -0.5 and -3.2 on the LLM Stats Score.

Cohere · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Command R+ and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at -0.5 and -3.2.

In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Command R+ wins 5; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Command R+

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 5 of 6 exact shared results

Choose Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2024

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-0.5
#335
-3.2
#350
-0.8
#331
-3.2
#342
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
5 of 6
1 of 6
Input price
$0.25 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Command R+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
-2.2#310
-2.4#312
1.3#189
-5.9#218
1.3#178
-7.2#204
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Command R+ · 19 for Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

6 shared

Command R+ outperforms in 5 benchmarks (ARC-C, HellaSwag, MMLU, TruthfulQA, Winogrande), while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (GSM8k).

Command R+ significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

97.0B diff

Command R+ has 97.0B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct, making it 1385.7% larger.

Cohere
Command R+
104.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
7.0Bparameters
104.0B
Command R+
7.0B
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Command R+ specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Command R+ specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is 1 month newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

2.1 years ago

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

2w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command R+ and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command R+
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Command R+ or Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Command R+ and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at -0.5 and -3.2. Command R+ is made by Cohere and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Command R+ compare to Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct scores HumanEval: 88.4%, GSM8k: 83.9%, MBPP: 83.5%, HellaSwag: 76.8%, Winogrande: 72.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Command R+ and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Command R+ supports 128K tokens and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command R+ and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.5 vs -3.2), licensing (CC BY-NC vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command R+ and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Command R+ is developed by Cohere and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.