Model Comparison

Command R+ vs Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen3 235B A22B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 235B A22B is 4.4x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Command R+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 235B A22B is better at 2 benchmarks (GSM8k, MMLU).

Qwen3 235B A22B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Apr 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B costs less

For input processing, Command R+ ($0.25/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than Qwen3 235B A22B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Command R+ ($1.00/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than Qwen3 235B A22B ($0.10/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Command R+ is more expensive than Qwen3 235B A22B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Apr 05 2026 • llm-stats.com
Cohere
Command R+
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerCohere
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.10
Best providerFireworks
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

131.0B diff

Qwen3 235B A22B has 131.0B more parameters than Command R+, making it 126.0% larger.

Cohere
Command R+
104.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B
235.0Bparameters
104.0B
Command R+
235.0B
Qwen3 235B A22B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sun Apr 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while Qwen3 235B A22B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Qwen3 235B A22B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while Qwen3 235B A22B was released on 2025-04-29.

Qwen3 235B A22B is 8 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

1.6 years ago

Qwen3 235B A22B

Apr 29, 2025

11 months ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Command R+ is available from Cohere, Bedrock. Qwen3 235B A22B is available from Fireworks, DeepInfra, Novita, Together.

Command R+

cohere logo
Cohere
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Qwen3 235B A22B

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.10/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 235B A22B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GSM8k score (94.4% vs 70.7%)
Higher MMLU score (87.8% vs 75.7%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
Command R+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen3 235B A22B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Command R+ is made by Cohere and Qwen3 235B A22B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. Qwen3 235B A22B scores Arena Hard: 95.6%, GSM8k: 94.4%, BBH: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.8%, MMLU-Redux: 87.4%.
Qwen3 235B A22B is 2.5x cheaper for input tokens. Command R+ costs $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output via cohere. Qwen3 235B A22B costs $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output via fireworks.
Command R+ supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 235B A22B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include input pricing ($0.25 vs $0.10/M), licensing (CC BY-NC vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Command R+ is developed by Cohere and Qwen3 235B A22B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.