DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Mistral Large 4
Mistral Large 4 leads the LLM Stats Score 46.2 to 24.1. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is 1.1x cheaper per token.
DeepSeek · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Mistral Large 4 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 46.2 to 24.1, ranking #34 overall.
On price, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is roughly 1.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Mistral Large 4 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose DeepSeek-R1-0528
- cost matters — it's about 1.1x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Mistral Large 4
- overall performance matters — it scores 46.2 and ranks #34 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
16 reported for DeepSeek-R1-0528 · 18 for Mistral Large 4
DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Mistral Large 4don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, DeepSeek-R1-0528 ($0.50/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than Mistral Large 4 ($0.68/1M tokens).
For output processing, DeepSeek-R1-0528 ($2.15/1M tokens) is 1.0x more expensive than Mistral Large 4 ($2.09/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Mistral Large 4 is more expensive than DeepSeek-R1-0528.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Mistral Large 4 has 379.0B more parameters than DeepSeek-R1-0528, making it 56.5% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Mistral Large 4 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-R1-0528's 163,840 tokens. Only DeepSeek-R1-0528 specifies output context (163,840 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Mistral Large 4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-R1-0528 does not.
Mistral Large 4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Mistral Large 4
License
Usage and distribution terms
DeepSeek-R1-0528 is licensed under MIT, while Mistral Large 4 uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
DeepSeek-R1-0528 was released on 2025-05-28, while Mistral Large 4 was released on 2026-10-06.
Mistral Large 4 is 17 months newer than DeepSeek-R1-0528.
May 28, 2025
1.4 years ago
Oct 6, 2026
1 weeks ago
1.4yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
DeepSeek-R1-0528 is available from DeepInfra, DeepSeek, Novita. Mistral Large 4 is available from Mistral AI.
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Mistral Large 4
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Mistral Large 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Mistral Large 4.