Model Comparison

DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Qwen3 VL 32B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking — which is better?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 (by DeepSeek) and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

DeepSeek-R1-0528 outperforms in 5 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-Redux, SimpleQA), while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks. DeepSeek-R1-0528 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose DeepSeek-R1-0528 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 5 of 5 shared benchmarks

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

DeepSeek-R1-0528 outperforms in 5 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-Redux, SimpleQA), while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek-R1-0528 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jun 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

638.0B diff

DeepSeek-R1-0528 has 638.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking, making it 1933.3% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
671.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
33.0Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek-R1-0528
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-R1-0528 specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only DeepSeek-R1-0528 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Jun 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-R1-0528 does not.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-R1-0528 is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-R1-0528 was released on 2025-05-28, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is 4 months newer than DeepSeek-R1-0528.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

May 28, 2025

1.0 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

8 months ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Higher AIME 2025 score (87.5% vs 83.7%)
Higher GPQA score (81.0% vs 73.1%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (85.0% vs 82.1%)
Higher MMLU-Redux score (93.4% vs 91.9%)
Higher SimpleQA score (92.3% vs 55.4%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.

Which is better, DeepSeek-R1-0528 or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is made by DeepSeek and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek-R1-0528 compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 scores MMLU-Redux: 93.4%, SimpleQA: 92.3%, AIME 2024: 91.4%, AIME 2025: 87.5%, MMLU-Pro: 85.0%. Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 96.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.7%, MMLU-Redux: 91.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 90.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.2%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 supports 131K tokens and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.