Model Comparison

GLM-5 vs DeepSeek-R1-0528Which is better in 2026?

GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is 1.7x cheaper per token.

Verdict: GLM-5 vs DeepSeek-R1-0528 — which is better?

GLM-5 (by Zhipu AI) and DeepSeek-R1-0528 (by DeepSeek) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

GLM-5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (BrowseComp, SWE-Bench Verified), while DeepSeek-R1-0528 is better at 0 benchmarks. GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is roughly 1.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GLM-5 also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose GLM-5 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026

Choose DeepSeek-R1-0528 if…

  • cost matters — it's about 1.7x cheaper per token
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

GLM-5 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (BrowseComp, SWE-Bench Verified), while DeepSeek-R1-0528 is better at 0 benchmarks.

GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Jun 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-R1-0528 costs less

For input processing, GLM-5 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than DeepSeek-R1-0528 ($0.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5 ($3.20/1M tokens) is 1.5x more expensive than DeepSeek-R1-0528 ($2.15/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5 is more expensive than DeepSeek-R1-0528.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Jun 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerFriendliAI
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$2.15
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

73.0B diff

GLM-5 has 73.0B more parameters than DeepSeek-R1-0528, making it 10.9% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
744.0Bparameters
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
671.0Bparameters
744.0B
GLM-5
671.0B
DeepSeek-R1-0528

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-5 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-R1-0528's 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek-R1-0528 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GLM-5 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Jun 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

GLM-5

MIT

Open weights

DeepSeek-R1-0528

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5 was released on 2026-02-11, while DeepSeek-R1-0528 was released on 2025-05-28.

GLM-5 is 9 months newer than DeepSeek-R1-0528.

GLM-5

Feb 11, 2026

3 months ago

8mo newer
DeepSeek-R1-0528

May 28, 2025

1.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-5 is available from FriendliAI, ZAI. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is available from DeepInfra, DeepSeek, Novita.

GLM-5

friendli logo
FriendliAI
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M

DeepSeek-R1-0528

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.15/1M
deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.55/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.19/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.70/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Zhipu AI
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher BrowseComp score (75.9% vs 8.9%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (77.8% vs 44.6%)
DeepSeek
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5 vs DeepSeek-R1-0528.

Which is better, GLM-5 or DeepSeek-R1-0528?

GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-5 is made by Zhipu AI and DeepSeek-R1-0528 is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GLM-5 compare to DeepSeek-R1-0528 in benchmarks?

GLM-5 scores t2-bench: 89.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 77.8%, BrowseComp: 75.9%, MCP Atlas: 67.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 56.2%. DeepSeek-R1-0528 scores MMLU-Redux: 93.4%, SimpleQA: 92.3%, AIME 2024: 91.4%, AIME 2025: 87.5%, MMLU-Pro: 85.0%.

Is GLM-5 cheaper than DeepSeek-R1-0528?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5 costs $1.00/M input and $3.20/M output via friendli. DeepSeek-R1-0528 costs $0.50/M input and $2.15/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5 and DeepSeek-R1-0528?

GLM-5 supports 200K tokens and DeepSeek-R1-0528 supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5 and DeepSeek-R1-0528?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 131K), input pricing ($1.00 vs $0.50/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GLM-5 and DeepSeek-R1-0528?

GLM-5 is developed by Zhipu AI and DeepSeek-R1-0528 is developed by DeepSeek.

Related comparisons