Model Comparison

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B vs Llama 4 ScoutWhich is better in 2026?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Llama 4 Scout is 1.3x cheaper per token.

Verdict: DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B vs Llama 4 Scout — which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B (by DeepSeek) and Llama 4 Scout (by Meta) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Llama 4 Scout is better at 0 benchmarks. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Llama 4 Scout is roughly 1.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Llama 4 Scout also accepts a larger context window (10,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks

Choose Llama 4 Scout if…

  • cost matters — it's about 1.3x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 10,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Llama 4 Scout is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jul 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 4 Scout costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B ($0.10/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than Llama 4 Scout ($0.08/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B ($0.40/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than Llama 4 Scout ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is more expensive than Llama 4 Scout.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jul 04 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerDeepinfra
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input tokens$0.08
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

38.4B diff

Llama 4 Scout has 38.4B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B, making it 54.4% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
70.6Bparameters
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
109.0Bparameters
70.6B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
109.0B
Llama 4 Scout

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Llama 4 Scout accepts 10,000,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B's 128,000 tokens. Llama 4 Scout can generate longer responses up to 10,000,000 tokens, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is limited to 128,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input10,000,000 tokens
Output10,000,000 tokens
Sat Jul 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B does not.

Llama 4 Scout can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 4 Scout

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is licensed under MIT, while Llama 4 Scout uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

MIT

Open weights

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B was released on 2025-01-20, while Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05.

Llama 4 Scout is 3 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Jan 20, 2025

1.5 years ago

Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.2 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is available from DeepInfra. Llama 4 Scout is available from DeepInfra, Lambda, Novita, Groq, Fireworks, Together.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M

Llama 4 Scout

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
lambda logo
Lambda
Input Price:Input: $0.08/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
groq logo
Groq
Input Price:Input: $0.11/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.34/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.59/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek
Higher GPQA score (65.2% vs 57.2%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (57.5% vs 32.8%)
Meta
Larger context window (10,000,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Llama 4 Scout side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
✓ Preferred
Llama 4 Scout
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Meta
Llama 4 Scout

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B vs Llama 4 Scout.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B or Llama 4 Scout?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is made by DeepSeek and Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B compare to Llama 4 Scout in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B scores MATH-500: 94.5%, AIME 2024: 86.7%, GPQA: 65.2%, LiveCodeBench: 57.5%. Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%.

Is DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B cheaper than Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is 1.3x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via deepinfra. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.08/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Llama 4 Scout?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B supports 128K tokens and Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Llama 4 Scout?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 10.0M), input pricing ($0.10 vs $0.08/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Llama 4 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Llama 4 Scout?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is developed by DeepSeek and Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons