The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct are closely matched at 14.7 and 12.9 on the LLM Stats Score.

DeepSeek · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 14.7 and 12.9.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
14.7
#218
12.9
#233
14.9
#212
13.0
#225
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.40 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
16.6#194
7.9#253
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B · 30 for Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1.4B diff

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has 1.4B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B, making it 2.0% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
70.6Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
72.0Bparameters
70.6B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
72.0B
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B does not.

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is licensed under MIT, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct uses tongyi-qianwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

MIT

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

tongyi-qianwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B was released on 2025-01-20, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26.

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is 0 month newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.6 years ago

6d newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 14.7 and 12.9. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is made by DeepSeek and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B compare to Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B scores MATH-500: 94.5%, AIME 2024: 86.7%, GPQA: 65.2%, LiveCodeBench: 57.5%. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct scores DocVQA: 96.4%, Android Control Low_EM: 93.7%, ChartQA: 89.5%, OCRBench: 88.5%, AI2D: 88.4%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B supports 128K tokens and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (14.7 vs 12.9), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs tongyi-qianwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.