The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B vs Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking are closely matched at 7.0 and 12.9 on the LLM Stats Score.

DeepSeek · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 7.0 and 12.9.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B

  • you are already invested in the DeepSeek ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
7.0
#290
12.9
#249
7.3
#282
14.0
#231
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.00 / M
Context window
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking
10.8#248
15.6#216
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B · 48 for Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

1 shared

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

4.0B diff

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B has 4.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking, making it 100.8% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B
8.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking
4.0Bparameters
8.0B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B
4.0B
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B does not.

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B was released on 2025-01-20, while Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is 8 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B

Jan 20, 2025

1.7 years ago

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

12 months ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B vs Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B or Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 7.0 and 12.9. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B is made by DeepSeek and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B compare to Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B scores MATH-500: 89.1%, AIME 2024: 80.0%, GPQA: 49.0%, LiveCodeBench: 39.6%. Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 94.2%, ScreenSpot: 92.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 86.7%, MMLU-Redux: 86.0%, AI2D: 84.9%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (7.0 vs 12.9), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.