The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3 Haiku vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Claude 3 Haiku and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B are closely matched at -1.5 and -3.0 on the LLM Stats Score.

Anthropic · DeepSeek · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3 Haiku and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at -1.5 and -3.0.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3 Haiku

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.25/M input and $1.25/M output

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-1.5
#335
-3.0
#342
-1.5
#328
-2.6
#332
0.6
#239
-4.6
#259
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.25 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.25 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude 3 Haiku
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
4.3#283
5.4#271
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

10 reported for Claude 3 Haiku · 4 for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

1 shared

Claude 3 Haiku outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Sep 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3 Haiku specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Sep 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B does not.

Claude 3 Haiku can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Haiku was released on 2024-03-13, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B was released on 2025-01-20.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is 10 months newer than Claude 3 Haiku.

Claude 3 Haiku

Mar 13, 2024

2.5 years ago

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Jan 20, 2025

1.7 years ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3 Haiku and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3 Haiku
✓ Preferred
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Haiku vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B.

Which is better, Claude 3 Haiku or DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B?

Claude 3 Haiku and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at -1.5 and -3.0. Claude 3 Haiku is made by Anthropic and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3 Haiku compare to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Haiku scores ARC-C: 89.2%, GSM8k: 88.9%, HellaSwag: 85.9%, DROP: 78.4%, HumanEval: 75.9%. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B scores MATH-500: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 52.7%, GPQA: 33.8%, LiveCodeBench: 16.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Haiku and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B?

Claude 3 Haiku supports 200K tokens and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Haiku and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-1.5 vs -3.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Haiku and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B?

Claude 3 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is developed by DeepSeek.