The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs DeepSeek-V3 0324

DeepSeek-V3 0324 leads the LLM Stats Score 13.4 to -3.0.

DeepSeek · DeepSeek · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V3 0324 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 13.4 to -3.0, ranking #251 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek-V3 0324 wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

  • you are already invested in the DeepSeek ecosystem

Choose DeepSeek-V3 0324

  • overall performance matters — it scores 13.4 and ranks #251 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 4 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-3.0
#348
13.4
#251
-2.6
#338
13.6
#241
-4.6
#265
4.0
#219
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 4
4 of 4
Input price
— / M
$0.24 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.90 / M
Context window
—
163,840

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
DeepSeek-V3 0324
5.4#272
15.8#213
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B · 5 for DeepSeek-V3 0324

4 shared

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while DeepSeek-V3 0324 is better at 4 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA, LiveCodeBench, MATH-500).

DeepSeek-V3 0324 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

669.2B diff

DeepSeek-V3 0324 has 669.2B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B, making it 37596.6% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
1.8Bparameters
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324
671.0Bparameters
1.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
671.0B
DeepSeek-V3 0324

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-V3 0324 specifies input context (163,840 tokens). Only DeepSeek-V3 0324 specifies output context (163,840 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Input163,840 tokens
Output163,840 tokens
Sun Sep 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is licensed under MIT, while DeepSeek-V3 0324 uses MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed).

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

MIT

Open weights

DeepSeek-V3 0324

MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed)

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B was released on 2025-01-20, while DeepSeek-V3 0324 was released on 2025-03-25.

DeepSeek-V3 0324 is 2 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Jan 20, 2025

1.7 years ago

DeepSeek-V3 0324

Mar 25, 2025

1.5 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and DeepSeek-V3 0324 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
✓ Preferred
DeepSeek-V3 0324
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs DeepSeek-V3 0324.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B or DeepSeek-V3 0324?

DeepSeek-V3 0324 leads the LLM Stats Score 13.4 to -3.0. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is made by DeepSeek and DeepSeek-V3 0324 is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B compare to DeepSeek-V3 0324 in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B scores MATH-500: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 52.7%, GPQA: 33.8%, LiveCodeBench: 16.9%. DeepSeek-V3 0324 scores MATH-500: 94.0%, MMLU-Pro: 81.2%, GPQA: 68.4%, AIME 2024: 59.4%, LiveCodeBench: 49.2%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and DeepSeek-V3 0324?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B supports an unknown number of tokens and DeepSeek-V3 0324 supports 164K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and DeepSeek-V3 0324?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-3.0 vs 13.4), licensing (MIT vs MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed)). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.