The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs Gemma 3 4B

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and Gemma 3 4B are closely matched at -2.4 and -1.3 on the LLM Stats Score.

DeepSeek · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and Gemma 3 4B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at -2.4 and -1.3.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results

Choose Gemma 3 4B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-2.4
#320
-1.3
#315
-2.0
#310
-2.3
#312
-4.5
#241
-4.3
#237
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.02 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.04 / M
Context window
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Gemma 3 4B
5.7#255
5.5#259
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B · 26 for Gemma 3 4B

2 shared

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Gemma 3 4B is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Aug 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2.2B diff

Gemma 3 4B has 2.2B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B, making it 124.7% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
1.8Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3 4B
4.0Bparameters
1.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
4.0B
Gemma 3 4B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3 4B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 4B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sat Aug 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B does not.

Gemma 3 4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3 4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is licensed under MIT, while Gemma 3 4B uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

MIT

Open weights

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B was released on 2025-01-20, while Gemma 3 4B was released on 2025-03-12.

Gemma 3 4B is 2 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

Gemma 3 4B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3 4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3 4B's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B's cutoff date.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Gemma 3 4B

Aug 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and Gemma 3 4B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3 4B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs Gemma 3 4B.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B or Gemma 3 4B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and Gemma 3 4B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at -2.4 and -1.3. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is made by DeepSeek and Gemma 3 4B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B compare to Gemma 3 4B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B scores MATH-500: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 52.7%, GPQA: 33.8%, LiveCodeBench: 16.9%. Gemma 3 4B scores IFEval: 90.2%, GSM8k: 89.2%, DocVQA: 75.8%, MATH: 75.6%, AI2D: 74.8%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and Gemma 3 4B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B supports an unknown number of tokens and Gemma 3 4B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and Gemma 3 4B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-2.4 vs -1.3), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and Gemma 3 4B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is developed by DeepSeek and Gemma 3 4B is developed by Google.