The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Qwen3 30B A3B leads the LLM Stats Score 17.7 to -2.7.

DeepSeek · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3 30B A3B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 17.7 to -2.7, ranking #200 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 30B A3B wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

  • you are already invested in the DeepSeek ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 30B A3B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 17.7 and ranks #200 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-2.7
#326
17.7
#200
-2.4
#316
18.0
#193
-4.5
#245
10.0
#155
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Qwen3 30B A3B
5.7#261
19.6#158
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B · 8 for Qwen3 30B A3B

3 shared

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA, LiveCodeBench).

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

28.7B diff

Qwen3 30B A3B has 28.7B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B, making it 1613.5% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
1.8Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
30.5Bparameters
1.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
30.5B
Qwen3 30B A3B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 30B A3B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Qwen3 30B A3B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 30B A3B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B was released on 2025-01-20, while Qwen3 30B A3B was released on 2025-04-29.

Qwen3 30B A3B is 3 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apr 29, 2025

1.3 years ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and Qwen3 30B A3B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 30B A3B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs Qwen3 30B A3B.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Qwen3 30B A3B leads the LLM Stats Score 17.7 to -2.7. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is made by DeepSeek and Qwen3 30B A3B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B compare to Qwen3 30B A3B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B scores MATH-500: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 52.7%, GPQA: 33.8%, LiveCodeBench: 16.9%. Qwen3 30B A3B scores Arena Hard: 91.0%, AIME 2024: 80.4%, LiveBench: 74.3%, Multi-IF: 72.2%, AIME 2025: 70.9%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and Qwen3 30B A3B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-2.7 vs 17.7), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and Qwen3 30B A3B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen3 30B A3B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.