The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking leads the LLM Stats Score 16.2 to -3.0.

DeepSeek · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking leads the overall LLM Stats Score 16.2 to -3.0, ranking #224 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

  • you are already invested in the DeepSeek ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

  • overall performance matters — it scores 16.2 and ranks #224 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-3.0
#342
16.2
#224
-2.6
#332
17.2
#211
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.18 / M
Output price
— / M
$2.09 / M
Context window
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
5.4#271
18.8#176
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B · 50 for Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

1 shared

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

7.2B diff

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking has 7.2B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B, making it 405.6% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
1.8Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
9.0Bparameters
1.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
9.0B
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B does not.

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B was released on 2025-01-20, while Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is 8 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Jan 20, 2025

1.7 years ago

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

12 months ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B or Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking leads the LLM Stats Score 16.2 to -3.0. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is made by DeepSeek and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B compare to Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B scores MATH-500: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 52.7%, GPQA: 33.8%, LiveCodeBench: 16.9%. Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 95.3%, ScreenSpot: 93.6%, MMLU-Redux: 88.8%, MMBench-V1.1: 87.5%, InfoVQAtest: 86.0%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-3.0 vs 16.2), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen3 VL 8B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.