Model Comparison

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Gemma 2 27BWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Gemma 2 27B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Gemma 2 27B — which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B (by DeepSeek) and Gemma 2 27B (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

Choose Gemma 2 27B if…

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Gemma 2 27Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

12.4B diff

Gemma 2 27B has 12.4B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B, making it 83.8% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
14.8Bparameters
Google
Gemma 2 27B
27.2Bparameters
14.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
27.2B
Gemma 2 27B

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is licensed under MIT, while Gemma 2 27B uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

MIT

Open weights

Gemma 2 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B was released on 2025-01-20, while Gemma 2 27B was released on 2024-06-27.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is 7 months newer than Gemma 2 27B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

Jan 20, 2025

1.4 years ago

6mo newer
Gemma 2 27B

Jun 27, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Gemma 2 27B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
✓ Preferred
Gemma 2 27B
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Google
Gemma 2 27B

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Gemma 2 27B.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B or Gemma 2 27B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B (DeepSeek) and Gemma 2 27B (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B compare to Gemma 2 27B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B scores MATH-500: 93.9%, AIME 2024: 80.0%, GPQA: 59.1%, LiveCodeBench: 53.1%. Gemma 2 27B scores ARC-E: 88.6%, HellaSwag: 86.4%, BoolQ: 84.8%, TriviaQA: 83.7%, Winogrande: 83.7%.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Gemma 2 27B?

Key differences include licensing (MIT vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Gemma 2 27B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is developed by DeepSeek and Gemma 2 27B is developed by Google.

Related comparisons