The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Gemma 2 9B

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B leads the LLM Stats Score 11.1 to -4.8.

DeepSeek · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 11.1 to -4.8, ranking #244 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 11.1 and ranks #244 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

Choose Gemma 2 9B

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
DeepSeek
Gemma 2 9B
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
11.1
#244
-4.8
#336
Reasoning
11.4
#241
-5.1
#329
Coding
5.6
#186
-11.0
#251
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Gemma 2 9B
Math
13.5#218
-3.3#303
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B · 16 for Gemma 2 9B

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Gemma 2 9Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

5.6B diff

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B has 5.6B more parameters than Gemma 2 9B, making it 60.2% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
14.8Bparameters
Google
Gemma 2 9B
9.2Bparameters
14.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
9.2B
Gemma 2 9B

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is licensed under MIT, while Gemma 2 9B uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

MIT

Open weights

Gemma 2 9B

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B was released on 2025-01-20, while Gemma 2 9B was released on 2024-06-27.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is 7 months newer than Gemma 2 9B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

6mo newer
Gemma 2 9B

Jun 27, 2024

2.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Gemma 2 9B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
✓ Preferred
Gemma 2 9B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Gemma 2 9B.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B or Gemma 2 9B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B leads the LLM Stats Score 11.1 to -4.8. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is made by DeepSeek and Gemma 2 9B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B compare to Gemma 2 9B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B scores MATH-500: 93.9%, AIME 2024: 80.0%, GPQA: 59.1%, LiveCodeBench: 53.1%. Gemma 2 9B scores ARC-E: 88.0%, BoolQ: 84.2%, HellaSwag: 81.9%, PIQA: 81.7%, Winogrande: 80.6%.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Gemma 2 9B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (11.1 vs -4.8), licensing (MIT vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Gemma 2 9B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is developed by DeepSeek and Gemma 2 9B is developed by Google.

Related comparisons