The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Llama 4 Scout

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Llama 4 Scout are closely matched at 10.4 and 7.3 on the LLM Stats Score.

DeepSeek · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Llama 4 Scout are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 10.4 and 7.3.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results

Choose Llama 4 Scout

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
10.4
#286
7.3
#309
10.7
#283
6.1
#312
5.3
#221
0.3
#263
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.08 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Context window
—
10,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Llama 4 Scout
13.3#240
12.8#243
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B · 12 for Llama 4 Scout

2 shared

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Llama 4 Scout is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Oct 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

94.2B diff

Llama 4 Scout has 94.2B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B, making it 636.5% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
14.8Bparameters
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
109.0Bparameters
14.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
109.0B
Llama 4 Scout

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 4 Scout specifies input context (10,000,000 tokens). Only Llama 4 Scout specifies output context (10,000,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input10,000,000 tokens
Output10,000,000 tokens
Tue Oct 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B does not.

Llama 4 Scout can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 4 Scout

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is licensed under MIT, while Llama 4 Scout uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

MIT

Open weights

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B was released on 2025-01-20, while Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05.

Llama 4 Scout is 3 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

Jan 20, 2025

1.8 years ago

Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.6 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Llama 4 Scout side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
✓ Preferred
Llama 4 Scout
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Llama 4 Scout.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B or Llama 4 Scout?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Llama 4 Scout are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 10.4 and 7.3. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is made by DeepSeek and Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B compare to Llama 4 Scout in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B scores MATH-500: 93.9%, AIME 2024: 80.0%, GPQA: 59.1%, LiveCodeBench: 53.1%. Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Llama 4 Scout?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B supports an unknown number of tokens and Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Llama 4 Scout?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (10.4 vs 7.3), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Llama 4 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Llama 4 Scout?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is developed by DeepSeek and Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta.