Model Comparison

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (LiveCodeBench).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

57.9B diff

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 57.9B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B, making it 391.2% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
14.8Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
72.7Bparameters
14.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
72.7B
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Thu May 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is licensed under MIT, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct uses Qwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

MIT

Open weights

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Qwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B was released on 2025-01-20, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is 4 months newer than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

Jan 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

4mo newer
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher GPQA score (59.1% vs 49.0%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (55.5% vs 53.1%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is made by DeepSeek and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B compare to Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B scores MATH-500: 93.9%, AIME 2024: 80.0%, GPQA: 59.1%, LiveCodeBench: 53.1%. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.8%, MT-Bench: 93.5%, MBPP: 88.2%, MMLU-Redux: 86.8%, HumanEval: 86.6%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Key differences include licensing (MIT vs Qwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.