Model Comparison

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen3 235B A22B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen3 235B A22B is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2024, LiveCodeBench).

Qwen3 235B A22B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Apr 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Apr 20 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.10
Best providerFireworks
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

220.2B diff

Qwen3 235B A22B has 220.2B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B, making it 1487.8% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
14.8Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B
235.0Bparameters
14.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
235.0B
Qwen3 235B A22B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 235B A22B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Qwen3 235B A22B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mon Apr 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 235B A22B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 235B A22B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B was released on 2025-01-20, while Qwen3 235B A22B was released on 2025-04-29.

Qwen3 235B A22B is 3 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

Jan 20, 2025

1.2 years ago

Qwen3 235B A22B

Apr 29, 2025

11 months ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher GPQA score (59.1% vs 47.5%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 235B A22B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Higher AIME 2024 score (85.7% vs 80.0%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (70.7% vs 53.1%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen3 235B A22B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is made by DeepSeek and Qwen3 235B A22B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B scores MATH-500: 93.9%, AIME 2024: 80.0%, GPQA: 59.1%, LiveCodeBench: 53.1%. Qwen3 235B A22B scores Arena Hard: 95.6%, GSM8k: 94.4%, BBH: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.8%, MMLU-Redux: 87.4%.
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 235B A22B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen3 235B A22B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.