Model Comparison

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Qwen3 VL 32B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking — which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B (by DeepSeek) and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B if…

  • you are already invested in the DeepSeek ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Jun 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

18.2B diff

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking has 18.2B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B, making it 123.0% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
14.8Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
33.0Bparameters
14.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B does not.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B was released on 2025-01-20, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is 8 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

Jan 20, 2025

1.4 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

8 months ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (73.1% vs 59.1%)

Detailed Comparison

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is made by DeepSeek and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B scores MATH-500: 93.9%, AIME 2024: 80.0%, GPQA: 59.1%, LiveCodeBench: 53.1%. Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 96.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.7%, MMLU-Redux: 91.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 90.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.2%.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.