The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Gemma 2 9B

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the LLM Stats Score 13.1 to -4.9.

DeepSeek · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 13.1 to -4.9, ranking #264 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 13.1 and ranks #264 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

Choose Gemma 2 9B

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
Gemma 2 9B
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
13.1
#264
-4.9
#370
Reasoning
13.3
#253
-5.2
#363
Coding
8.1
#196
-11.1
#280
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.12 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Gemma 2 9B
Math
15.1#223
-3.8#320
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B · 16 for Gemma 2 9B

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Gemma 2 9Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

23.6B diff

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B has 23.6B more parameters than Gemma 2 9B, making it 255.0% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
32.8Bparameters
Google
Gemma 2 9B
9.2Bparameters
32.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
9.2B
Gemma 2 9B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 2 9B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Oct 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is licensed under MIT, while Gemma 2 9B uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

MIT

Open weights

Gemma 2 9B

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B was released on 2025-01-20, while Gemma 2 9B was released on 2024-06-27.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 7 months newer than Gemma 2 9B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Jan 20, 2025

1.7 years ago

6mo newer
Gemma 2 9B

Jun 27, 2024

2.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Gemma 2 9B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
✓ Preferred
Gemma 2 9B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Gemma 2 9B.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or Gemma 2 9B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the LLM Stats Score 13.1 to -4.9. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is made by DeepSeek and Gemma 2 9B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B compare to Gemma 2 9B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B scores MATH-500: 94.3%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 62.1%, LiveCodeBench: 57.2%. Gemma 2 9B scores ARC-E: 88.0%, BoolQ: 84.2%, HellaSwag: 81.9%, PIQA: 81.7%, Winogrande: 80.6%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Gemma 2 9B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports 128K tokens and Gemma 2 9B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Gemma 2 9B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (13.1 vs -4.9), licensing (MIT vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Gemma 2 9B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is developed by DeepSeek and Gemma 2 9B is developed by Google.

Related comparisons