The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs GPT-4

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the LLM Stats Score 13.2 to 3.2. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 277.8x cheaper per token.

DeepSeek · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 13.2 to 3.2, ranking #236 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is roughly 277.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B also accepts a larger context window (128,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 13.2 and ranks #236 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 277.8x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 128,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose GPT-4

  • you want predictable pricing at $30.00/M input and $60.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
13.2
#236
3.2
#298
13.4
#227
3.3
#289
8.3
#175
-5.1
#251
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.12 / M
$30.00 / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
$60.00 / M
Context window
128,000
32,768

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
GPT-4
15.2#209
8.8#251
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B · 12 for GPT-4

1 shared

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while GPT-4 is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B ($0.12/1M tokens) is 250.0x cheaper than GPT-4 ($30.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B ($0.18/1M tokens) is 333.3x cheaper than GPT-4 ($60.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4 is more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input tokens$0.12
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
OpenAI
GPT-4
Input tokens$30.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B accepts 128,000 input tokens compared to GPT-4's 32,768 tokens. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while GPT-4 is limited to 32,768 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B does not.

GPT-4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is licensed under MIT, while GPT-4 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

MIT

Open weights

GPT-4

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B was released on 2025-01-20, while GPT-4 was released on 2023-06-13.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 20 months newer than GPT-4.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

1.6yr newer
GPT-4

Jun 13, 2023

3.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2022-12-31, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4's training data extends to 2022-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's cutoff date.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

GPT-4

Dec 2022

Provider Availability

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is available from DeepInfra. GPT-4 is available from Azure, OpenAI.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.12/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M

GPT-4

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $30.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $30.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and GPT-4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
✓ Preferred
GPT-4
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs GPT-4.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or GPT-4?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the LLM Stats Score 13.2 to 3.2. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is made by DeepSeek and GPT-4 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B compare to GPT-4 in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B scores MATH-500: 94.3%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 62.1%, LiveCodeBench: 57.2%. GPT-4 scores AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC): 96.3%, HellaSwag: 95.3%, Uniform Bar Exam: 90.0%, SAT Math: 89.0%, LSAT: 88.0%.

Is DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B cheaper than GPT-4?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 250.0x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B costs $0.12/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra. GPT-4 costs $30.00/M input and $60.00/M output via azure.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and GPT-4?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports 128K tokens and GPT-4 supports 33K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and GPT-4?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (13.2 vs 3.2), context window (128K vs 33K), input pricing ($0.12 vs $30.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and GPT-4?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is developed by DeepSeek and GPT-4 is developed by OpenAI.