The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Grok-1.5

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the LLM Stats Score 13.1 to -2.6.

DeepSeek · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 13.1 to -2.6, ranking #248 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 13.1 and ranks #248 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Grok-1.5

  • you are already invested in the xAI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
13.1
#248
-2.6
#340
13.3
#237
-2.2
#330
8.1
#182
-0.9
#246
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.12 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Grok-1.5
15.1#217
4.9#277
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B · 9 for Grok-1.5

1 shared

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Grok-1.5 is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
xAI
Grok-1.5
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Sep 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is licensed under MIT, while Grok-1.5 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

MIT

Open weights

Grok-1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B was released on 2025-01-20, while Grok-1.5 was released on 2024-03-28.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 10 months newer than Grok-1.5.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Jan 20, 2025

1.7 years ago

9mo newer
Grok-1.5

Mar 28, 2024

2.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Grok-1.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
✓ Preferred
Grok-1.5
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Grok-1.5.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or Grok-1.5?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the LLM Stats Score 13.1 to -2.6. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is made by DeepSeek and Grok-1.5 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B compare to Grok-1.5 in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B scores MATH-500: 94.3%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 62.1%, LiveCodeBench: 57.2%. Grok-1.5 scores GSM8k: 90.0%, DocVQA: 85.6%, MMLU: 81.3%, HumanEval: 74.1%, MMMU: 53.6%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Grok-1.5?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports 128K tokens and Grok-1.5 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Grok-1.5?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (13.1 vs -2.6), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Grok-1.5?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is developed by DeepSeek and Grok-1.5 is developed by xAI.