DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Mercury 3
Mercury 3 leads the LLM Stats Score 36.1 to 12.5. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 1.2x cheaper per token.
DeepSeek · Inception · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Mercury 3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 36.1 to 12.5, ranking #98 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Mercury 3 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is roughly 1.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Mercury 3 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
- cost matters — it's about 1.2x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Mercury 3
- overall performance matters — it scores 36.1 and ranks #98 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B · 12 for Mercury 3
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Mercury 3 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).
Mercury 3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B ($0.12/1M tokens) is 1.2x more expensive than Mercury 3 ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B ($0.18/1M tokens) is 1.9x cheaper than Mercury 3 ($0.35/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Mercury 3 is more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Mercury 3 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's 128,000 tokens. Mercury 3 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is limited to 128,000 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is licensed under MIT, while Mercury 3 uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B was released on 2025-01-20, while Mercury 3 was released on 2026-10-19.
Mercury 3 is 21 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.
Jan 20, 2025
1.8 years ago
Oct 19, 2026
3 days ago
1.7yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is available from DeepInfra. Mercury 3 is available from Inception.
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Mercury 3
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Mercury 3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Mercury 3.
Related comparisons
More DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B comparisons
- DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Beam 1.0
- DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
- DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Muse Spark Open
- DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)