Model Comparison

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs o1-pro

o1-pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while o1-pro is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA).

o1-pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon May 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenAI
o1-pro
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon May 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

o1-pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B does not.

o1-pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o1-pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is licensed under MIT, while o1-pro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

MIT

Open weights

o1-pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B was released on 2025-01-20, while o1-pro was released on 2024-12-17.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 1 month newer than o1-pro.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Jan 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

1mo newer
o1-pro

Dec 17, 2024

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o1-pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-09-30, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o1-pro's training data extends to 2023-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's cutoff date.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

o1-pro

Sep 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Has open weights
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2024 score (86.0% vs 83.3%)
Higher GPQA score (79.0% vs 62.1%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
OpenAI
o1-pro

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs o1-pro.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or o1-pro?

o1-pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is made by DeepSeek and o1-pro is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B compare to o1-pro in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B scores MATH-500: 94.3%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 62.1%, LiveCodeBench: 57.2%. o1-pro scores AIME 2024: 86.0%, GPQA: 79.0%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and o1-pro?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports 128K tokens and o1-pro supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and o1-pro?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and o1-pro?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is developed by DeepSeek and o1-pro is developed by OpenAI.