The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Phi 4 Mini

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the LLM Stats Score 13.3 to -4.0.

DeepSeek · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 13.3 to -4.0, ranking #235 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 13.3 and ranks #235 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

Choose Phi 4 Mini

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
13.3
#235
-4.0
#334
13.5
#226
-4.1
#327
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.12 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Phi 4 Mini
15.2#208
2.7#282
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B · 17 for Phi 4 Mini

1 shared

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Phi 4 Mini is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

29.0B diff

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B has 29.0B more parameters than Phi 4 Mini, making it 754.2% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
32.8Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini
3.8Bparameters
32.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
3.8B
Phi 4 Mini

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

MIT

Open weights

Phi 4 Mini

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B was released on 2025-01-20, while Phi 4 Mini was released on 2025-02-01.

Phi 4 Mini is 0 month newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

Phi 4 Mini

Feb 1, 2025

1.6 years ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Mini's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's cutoff date.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Phi 4 Mini

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Phi 4 Mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Mini
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Phi 4 Mini.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or Phi 4 Mini?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the LLM Stats Score 13.3 to -4.0. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is made by DeepSeek and Phi 4 Mini is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B compare to Phi 4 Mini in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B scores MATH-500: 94.3%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 62.1%, LiveCodeBench: 57.2%. Phi 4 Mini scores GSM8k: 88.6%, ARC-C: 83.7%, BoolQ: 81.2%, OpenBookQA: 79.2%, PIQA: 77.6%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Phi 4 Mini?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports 128K tokens and Phi 4 Mini supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Phi 4 Mini?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (13.3 vs -4.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Phi 4 Mini?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is developed by DeepSeek and Phi 4 Mini is developed by Microsoft.