The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B vs GPT-4.1 nano

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B leads the LLM Stats Score 8.6 to 1.9.

DeepSeek · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 8.6 to 1.9, ranking #261 overall.

The models split the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 8.6 and ranks #261 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose GPT-4.1 nano

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
8.6
#261
1.9
#303
8.9
#251
2.3
#290
2.2
#214
-11.7
#252
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 2
1 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.40 / M
Context window
1,047,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B
GPT-4.1 nano
14.1#211
5.3#266
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B · 24 for GPT-4.1 nano

2 shared

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (AIME 2024), while GPT-4.1 nano is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-4.1 nano specifies input context (1,047,576 tokens). Only GPT-4.1 nano specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 nano
Input1,047,576 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-4.1 nano supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B does not.

GPT-4.1 nano can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4.1 nano

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B is licensed under MIT, while GPT-4.1 nano uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B

MIT

Open weights

GPT-4.1 nano

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B was released on 2025-01-20, while GPT-4.1 nano was released on 2025-04-14.

GPT-4.1 nano is 3 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

GPT-4.1 nano

Apr 14, 2025

1.4 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4.1 nano has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4.1 nano's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B's cutoff date.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B

GPT-4.1 nano

May 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B and GPT-4.1 nano side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B
✓ Preferred
GPT-4.1 nano
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B vs GPT-4.1 nano.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B or GPT-4.1 nano?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B leads the LLM Stats Score 8.6 to 1.9. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B is made by DeepSeek and GPT-4.1 nano is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B compare to GPT-4.1 nano in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B scores MATH-500: 92.8%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 49.1%, LiveCodeBench: 37.6%. GPT-4.1 nano scores MMLU: 80.1%, IFEval: 74.5%, CharXiv-D: 73.9%, MMMLU: 66.9%, Multi-IF: 57.2%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B and GPT-4.1 nano?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B supports an unknown number of tokens and GPT-4.1 nano supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B and GPT-4.1 nano?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (8.6 vs 1.9), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B and GPT-4.1 nano?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B is developed by DeepSeek and GPT-4.1 nano is developed by OpenAI.