Model Comparison

DeepSeek-R1 vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: DeepSeek-R1 vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B — which is better?

DeepSeek-R1 (by DeepSeek) and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B (by DeepSeek) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is roughly 7.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

DeepSeek-R1 also accepts a larger context window (131,072 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose DeepSeek-R1 if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 131,072 token context window

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B if…

  • cost matters — it's about 7.1x cheaper per token

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-R1 ($0.55/1M tokens) is 4.6x more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B ($0.12/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-R1 ($2.19/1M tokens) is 12.2x more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B ($0.18/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-R1 is more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Jun 09 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1
Input tokens$0.55
Output tokens$2.19
Best providerDeepSeek
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input tokens$0.12
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

638.2B diff

DeepSeek-R1 has 638.2B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B, making it 1945.7% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1
671.0Bparameters
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
32.8Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek-R1
32.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-R1 accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek-R1 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is limited to 128,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue Jun 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

DeepSeek-R1

MIT

Open weights

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2025-01-20.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

DeepSeek-R1

Jan 20, 2025

1.4 years ago

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Jan 20, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-R1 is available from DeepSeek, DeepInfra, Together, Fireworks. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is available from DeepInfra.

DeepSeek-R1

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.55/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.19/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.85/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $7.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.00/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $8.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $8.00/1M

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.12/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-R1 vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.

Which is better, DeepSeek-R1 or DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

DeepSeek-R1 (DeepSeek) and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B (DeepSeek) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does DeepSeek-R1 compare to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B scores MATH-500: 94.3%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 62.1%, LiveCodeBench: 57.2%.

Is DeepSeek-R1 cheaper than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 4.6x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-R1 costs $0.55/M input and $2.19/M output via deepseek. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B costs $0.12/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

DeepSeek-R1 supports 131K tokens and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B?

Key differences include context window (131K vs 128K), input pricing ($0.55 vs $0.12/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.