The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-R1 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Comparing DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

DeepSeek · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is roughly 2.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-R1

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

Choose Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

  • cost matters — it's about 2.6x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.55 / M
$0.35 / M
Output price
$2.19 / M
$0.40 / M
Context window
131,072
131,072

Individual benchmarks

0 reported for DeepSeek-R1 · 14 for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-R1 ($0.55/1M tokens) is 1.6x more expensive than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.35/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-R1 ($2.19/1M tokens) is 5.5x more expensive than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-R1 is more expensive than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 12 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1
Input tokens$0.55
Output tokens$2.19
Best providerDeepSeek
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input tokens$0.35
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

598.3B diff

DeepSeek-R1 has 598.3B more parameters than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct, making it 823.0% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1
671.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
72.7Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek-R1
72.7B
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek-R1 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is limited to 8,192 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Mon Oct 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-R1 is licensed under MIT, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct uses Qwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-R1

MIT

Open weights

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Qwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-R1 was released on 2025-01-20, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

DeepSeek-R1 is 4 months newer than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.

DeepSeek-R1

Jan 20, 2025

1.7 years ago

4mo newer
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-R1 is available from DeepSeek, DeepInfra, Together, Fireworks. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks, Together.

DeepSeek-R1

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.55/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.19/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.85/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $7.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.00/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $8.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $8.00/1M

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.35/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-R1
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-R1 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.

Which is better, DeepSeek-R1 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

DeepSeek-R1 (DeepSeek) and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does DeepSeek-R1 compare to Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in benchmarks?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.8%, MT-Bench: 93.5%, MBPP: 88.2%, MMLU-Redux: 86.8%, HumanEval: 86.6%.

Is DeepSeek-R1 cheaper than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is 1.6x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-R1 costs $0.55/M input and $2.19/M output via deepseek. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.35/M input and $0.40/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

DeepSeek-R1 supports 131K tokens and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Key differences include input pricing ($0.55 vs $0.35/M), licensing (MIT vs Qwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

DeepSeek-R1 is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.