The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-R1 vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Comparing DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

DeepSeek · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-R1

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.55/M input and $2.19/M output

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.55 / M
— / M
Output price
$2.19 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072
Released
Jan 2025
Feb 2025
License
MIT
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

637.5B diff

DeepSeek-R1 has 637.5B more parameters than Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct, making it 1903.0% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1
671.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
33.5Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek-R1
33.5B
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-R1 specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only DeepSeek-R1 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-R1 does not.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-R1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-R1 is licensed under MIT, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-R1

MIT

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-R1 was released on 2025-01-20, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-02-28.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is 1 month newer than DeepSeek-R1.

DeepSeek-R1

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Feb 28, 2025

1.5 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-R1
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-R1 vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, DeepSeek-R1 or Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

DeepSeek-R1 (DeepSeek) and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does DeepSeek-R1 compare to Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQA: 94.8%, Android Control Low_EM: 93.3%, HumanEval: 91.5%, ScreenSpot: 88.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

DeepSeek-R1 supports 131K tokens and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

DeepSeek-R1 is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.