The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Zero vs Jamba 1.5 Mini

DeepSeek R1 Zero leads the LLM Stats Score 16.0 to -5.7.

DeepSeek · AI21 Labs · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Zero leads the overall LLM Stats Score 16.0 to -5.7, ranking #234 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek R1 Zero wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Zero

  • overall performance matters — it scores 16.0 and ranks #234 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

Choose Jamba 1.5 Mini

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.20/M input and $0.40/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
16.0
#234
-5.7
#367
16.3
#224
-5.6
#358
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.40 / M
Context window
—
256,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Jamba 1.5 Mini
17.5#195
-4.0#317
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Zero · 8 for Jamba 1.5 Mini

1 shared

DeepSeek R1 Zero outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Jamba 1.5 Mini is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek R1 Zero significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Oct 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

619.0B diff

DeepSeek R1 Zero has 619.0B more parameters than Jamba 1.5 Mini, making it 1190.4% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Zero
671.0Bparameters
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Mini
52.0Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek R1 Zero
52.0B
Jamba 1.5 Mini

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Jamba 1.5 Mini specifies input context (256,144 tokens). Only Jamba 1.5 Mini specifies output context (256,144 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Input256,144 tokens
Output256,144 tokens
Thu Oct 01 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Zero is licensed under MIT, while Jamba 1.5 Mini uses Jamba Open Model License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Zero

MIT

Open weights

Jamba 1.5 Mini

Jamba Open Model License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Zero was released on 2025-01-20, while Jamba 1.5 Mini was released on 2024-08-22.

DeepSeek R1 Zero is 5 months newer than Jamba 1.5 Mini.

DeepSeek R1 Zero

Jan 20, 2025

1.7 years ago

5mo newer
Jamba 1.5 Mini

Aug 22, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Jamba 1.5 Mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-03-05, while DeepSeek R1 Zero's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Jamba 1.5 Mini's training data extends to 2024-03-05, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek R1 Zero's cutoff date.

DeepSeek R1 Zero

—

Jamba 1.5 Mini

Mar 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Zero and Jamba 1.5 Mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Zero
✓ Preferred
Jamba 1.5 Mini
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Zero vs Jamba 1.5 Mini.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Zero or Jamba 1.5 Mini?

DeepSeek R1 Zero leads the LLM Stats Score 16.0 to -5.7. DeepSeek R1 Zero is made by DeepSeek and Jamba 1.5 Mini is made by AI21 Labs. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Zero compare to Jamba 1.5 Mini in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Zero scores MATH-500: 95.9%, AIME 2024: 86.7%, GPQA: 73.3%, LiveCodeBench: 50.0%. Jamba 1.5 Mini scores ARC-C: 85.7%, GSM8k: 75.8%, MMLU: 69.7%, TruthfulQA: 54.1%, Arena Hard: 46.1%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Zero and Jamba 1.5 Mini?

DeepSeek R1 Zero supports an unknown number of tokens and Jamba 1.5 Mini supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Zero and Jamba 1.5 Mini?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (16.0 vs -5.7), licensing (MIT vs Jamba Open Model License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Zero and Jamba 1.5 Mini?

DeepSeek R1 Zero is developed by DeepSeek and Jamba 1.5 Mini is developed by AI21 Labs.