The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Zero vs Llama 4 Scout

DeepSeek R1 Zero leads the LLM Stats Score 16.1 to 7.9.

DeepSeek · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Zero leads the overall LLM Stats Score 16.1 to 7.9, ranking #224 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek R1 Zero wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Zero

  • overall performance matters — it scores 16.1 and ranks #224 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results

Choose Llama 4 Scout

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
16.1
#224
7.9
#281
16.4
#214
6.7
#284
4.3
#207
0.4
#238
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
— / M
$0.08 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Context window
10,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Llama 4 Scout
17.6#192
12.8#231
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Zero · 12 for Llama 4 Scout

2 shared

DeepSeek R1 Zero outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Llama 4 Scout is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek R1 Zero significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Sep 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

562.0B diff

DeepSeek R1 Zero has 562.0B more parameters than Llama 4 Scout, making it 515.6% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Zero
671.0Bparameters
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
109.0Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek R1 Zero
109.0B
Llama 4 Scout

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 4 Scout specifies input context (10,000,000 tokens). Only Llama 4 Scout specifies output context (10,000,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input10,000,000 tokens
Output10,000,000 tokens
Wed Sep 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Zero does not.

Llama 4 Scout can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Zero

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Llama 4 Scout

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Zero is licensed under MIT, while Llama 4 Scout uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Zero

MIT

Open weights

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Zero was released on 2025-01-20, while Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05.

Llama 4 Scout is 3 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Zero.

DeepSeek R1 Zero

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.4 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Zero and Llama 4 Scout side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Zero
✓ Preferred
Llama 4 Scout
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Zero vs Llama 4 Scout.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Zero or Llama 4 Scout?

DeepSeek R1 Zero leads the LLM Stats Score 16.1 to 7.9. DeepSeek R1 Zero is made by DeepSeek and Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Zero compare to Llama 4 Scout in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Zero scores MATH-500: 95.9%, AIME 2024: 86.7%, GPQA: 73.3%, LiveCodeBench: 50.0%. Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Zero and Llama 4 Scout?

DeepSeek R1 Zero supports an unknown number of tokens and Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Zero and Llama 4 Scout?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (16.1 vs 7.9), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Llama 4 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Zero and Llama 4 Scout?

DeepSeek R1 Zero is developed by DeepSeek and Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta.