The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Zero vs QwQ-32B

DeepSeek R1 Zero and QwQ-32B are closely matched at 16.2 and 15.2 on the LLM Stats Score.

DeepSeek · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Zero and QwQ-32B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 16.2 and 15.2.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek R1 Zero wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Zero

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results

Choose QwQ-32B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
16.2
#205
15.2
#211
16.5
#197
15.9
#200
4.3
#194
10.3
#149
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 4
1 of 4
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Zero
QwQ-32B
17.7#180
18.2#170
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Zero · 7 for QwQ-32B

4 shared

DeepSeek R1 Zero outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA, MATH-500), while QwQ-32B is better at 1 benchmark (LiveCodeBench).

DeepSeek R1 Zero shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sun Aug 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

638.5B diff

DeepSeek R1 Zero has 638.5B more parameters than QwQ-32B, making it 1964.6% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Zero
671.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
32.5Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek R1 Zero
32.5B
QwQ-32B

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Zero is licensed under MIT, while QwQ-32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Zero

MIT

Open weights

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Zero was released on 2025-01-20, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

QwQ-32B is 1 month newer than DeepSeek R1 Zero.

DeepSeek R1 Zero

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.5 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while DeepSeek R1 Zero's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek R1 Zero's cutoff date.

DeepSeek R1 Zero

QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Zero and QwQ-32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Zero
✓ Preferred
QwQ-32B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Zero vs QwQ-32B.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Zero or QwQ-32B?

DeepSeek R1 Zero and QwQ-32B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 16.2 and 15.2. DeepSeek R1 Zero is made by DeepSeek and QwQ-32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Zero compare to QwQ-32B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Zero scores MATH-500: 95.9%, AIME 2024: 86.7%, GPQA: 73.3%, LiveCodeBench: 50.0%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Zero and QwQ-32B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (16.2 vs 15.2), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Zero and QwQ-32B?

DeepSeek R1 Zero is developed by DeepSeek and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.