Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 vs DeepSeek-R1Which is better in 2026?

Comparing DeepSeek-V2.5 and DeepSeek-R1 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: DeepSeek-V2.5 vs DeepSeek-R1 — which is better?

DeepSeek-V2.5 (by DeepSeek) and DeepSeek-R1 (by DeepSeek) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, DeepSeek-V2.5 is roughly 5.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

DeepSeek-R1 also accepts a larger context window (131,072 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose DeepSeek-V2.5 if…

  • cost matters — it's about 5.5x cheaper per token

Choose DeepSeek-R1 if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 131,072 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek-V2.5 and DeepSeek-R1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V2.5 costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V2.5 ($0.14/1M tokens) is 3.9x cheaper than DeepSeek-R1 ($0.55/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V2.5 ($0.28/1M tokens) is 7.8x cheaper than DeepSeek-R1 ($2.19/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-R1 is more expensive than DeepSeek-V2.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jun 27 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
Input tokens$0.14
Output tokens$0.28
Best providerDeepSeek
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1
Input tokens$0.55
Output tokens$2.19
Best providerDeepSeek
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

435.0B diff

DeepSeek-R1 has 435.0B more parameters than DeepSeek-V2.5, making it 184.3% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
236.0Bparameters
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1
671.0Bparameters
236.0B
DeepSeek-V2.5
671.0B
DeepSeek-R1

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-R1 accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V2.5's 8,192 tokens. DeepSeek-R1 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while DeepSeek-V2.5 is limited to 8,192 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
Input8,192 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sat Jun 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V2.5 is licensed under deepseek, while DeepSeek-R1 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V2.5

deepseek

Open weights

DeepSeek-R1

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released on 2024-05-08, while DeepSeek-R1 was released on 2025-01-20.

DeepSeek-R1 is 9 months newer than DeepSeek-V2.5.

DeepSeek-V2.5

May 8, 2024

2.1 years ago

DeepSeek-R1

Jan 20, 2025

1.4 years ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V2.5 is available from DeepSeek, DeepInfra, Hyperbolic. DeepSeek-R1 is available from DeepSeek, DeepInfra, Together, Fireworks.

DeepSeek-V2.5

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.70/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.40/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M

DeepSeek-R1

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.55/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.19/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.85/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $7.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.00/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $8.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $8.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Larger context window (131,072 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V2.5 and DeepSeek-R1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V2.5
✓ Preferred
DeepSeek-R1
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V2.5 vs DeepSeek-R1.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V2.5 or DeepSeek-R1?

DeepSeek-V2.5 (DeepSeek) and DeepSeek-R1 (DeepSeek) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does DeepSeek-V2.5 compare to DeepSeek-R1 in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V2.5 scores GSM8k: 95.1%, MT-Bench: 90.2%, HumanEval: 89.0%, BBH: 84.3%, AlignBench: 80.4%.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 cheaper than DeepSeek-R1?

DeepSeek-V2.5 is 3.9x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V2.5 costs $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output via deepseek. DeepSeek-R1 costs $0.55/M input and $2.19/M output via deepseek.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V2.5 and DeepSeek-R1?

DeepSeek-V2.5 supports 8K tokens and DeepSeek-R1 supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V2.5 and DeepSeek-R1?

Key differences include context window (8K vs 131K), input pricing ($0.14 vs $0.55/M), licensing (deepseek vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.