DeepSeek-V2.5 vs Mistral NeMo Instruct Comparison

Comparing DeepSeek-V2.5 and Mistral NeMo Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V2.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Mistral NeMo Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V2.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Mistral NeMo Instruct costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V2.5 ($0.14/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than Mistral NeMo Instruct ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V2.5 ($0.28/1M tokens) is 1.9x more expensive than Mistral NeMo Instruct ($0.15/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-V2.5 is more expensive than Mistral NeMo Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
Input tokens$0.14
Output tokens$0.28
Best providerDeepSeek
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.15
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

224.0B diff

DeepSeek-V2.5 has 224.0B more parameters than Mistral NeMo Instruct, making it 1866.7% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
236.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
12.0Bparameters
236.0B
DeepSeek-V2.5
12.0B
Mistral NeMo Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Mistral NeMo Instruct accepts 128,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V2.5's 8,192 tokens. Mistral NeMo Instruct can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while DeepSeek-V2.5 is limited to 8,192 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
Input8,192 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V2.5 is licensed under deepseek, while Mistral NeMo Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V2.5

deepseek

Open weights

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released on 2024-05-08, while Mistral NeMo Instruct was released on 2024-07-18.

Mistral NeMo Instruct is 2 months newer than DeepSeek-V2.5.

DeepSeek-V2.5

May 8, 2024

1.8 years ago

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Jul 18, 2024

1.7 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V2.5 is available from DeepSeek, DeepInfra, Hyperbolic. Mistral NeMo Instruct is available from Google, Mistral AI. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

DeepSeek-V2.5

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.70/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.40/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M

Mistral NeMo Instruct

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.15/1M
mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.15/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Higher MMLU score (80.4% vs 68.0%)
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct