Model Comparison
DeepSeek-V3 0324 vs DeepSeek-R1-0528Which is better in 2026?
DeepSeek-R1-0528 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3 0324 is 1.8x cheaper per token.
Verdict: DeepSeek-V3 0324 vs DeepSeek-R1-0528 — which is better?
DeepSeek-V3 0324 (by DeepSeek) and DeepSeek-R1-0528 (by DeepSeek) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
DeepSeek-V3 0324 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while DeepSeek-R1-0528 is better at 4 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA, LiveCodeBench, MMLU-Pro). DeepSeek-R1-0528 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, DeepSeek-V3 0324 is roughly 1.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
DeepSeek-V3 0324 also accepts a larger context window (163,840 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose DeepSeek-V3 0324 if…
- cost matters — it's about 1.8x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 163,840 token context window
Choose DeepSeek-R1-0528 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
DeepSeek-V3 0324 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while DeepSeek-R1-0528 is better at 4 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA, LiveCodeBench, MMLU-Pro).
DeepSeek-R1-0528 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, DeepSeek-V3 0324 ($0.28/1M tokens) is 1.8x cheaper than DeepSeek-R1-0528 ($0.50/1M tokens).
For output processing, DeepSeek-V3 0324 ($1.14/1M tokens) is 1.9x cheaper than DeepSeek-R1-0528 ($2.15/1M tokens).
In conclusion, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is more expensive than DeepSeek-V3 0324.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
DeepSeek-R1-0528 has 0.0B more parameters than DeepSeek-V3 0324, making it 0.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
DeepSeek-V3 0324 accepts 163,840 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-R1-0528's 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek-V3 0324 can generate longer responses up to 163,840 tokens, while DeepSeek-R1-0528 is limited to 131,072 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
DeepSeek-V3 0324 is licensed under MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed), while DeepSeek-R1-0528 uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed)
Open weights
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
DeepSeek-V3 0324 was released on 2025-03-25, while DeepSeek-R1-0528 was released on 2025-05-28.
DeepSeek-R1-0528 is 2 months newer than DeepSeek-V3 0324.
Mar 25, 2025
1.2 years ago
May 28, 2025
1.0 years ago
2mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
DeepSeek-V3 0324 is available from Novita. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is available from DeepInfra, DeepSeek, Novita.
DeepSeek-V3 0324
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
DeepSeek-V3 0324
View detailsDeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
View detailsDeepSeek
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about DeepSeek-V3 0324 vs DeepSeek-R1-0528.