DeepSeek-V3 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
DeepSeek-V3 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct are closely matched at 15.6 and 13.8 on the LLM Stats Score. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 3.4x cheaper per token.
DeepSeek · Meta · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
DeepSeek-V3 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 15.6 and 13.8.
In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek-V3 wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is roughly 3.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose DeepSeek-V3
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024
Choose Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- cost matters — it's about 3.4x cheaper per token
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
20 reported for DeepSeek-V3 · 9 for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
DeepSeek-V3 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU, MMLU-Pro), while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (IFEval).
DeepSeek-V3 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, DeepSeek-V3 ($0.27/1M tokens) is 2.7x more expensive than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, DeepSeek-V3 ($0.89/1M tokens) is 4.5x more expensive than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ($0.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, DeepSeek-V3 is more expensive than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
DeepSeek-V3 has 601.0B more parameters than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, making it 858.6% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 131,072 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 131,072 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
DeepSeek-V3 is licensed under MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed), while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct uses Llama 3.3 Community License Agreement.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed)
Open weights
Llama 3.3 Community License Agreement
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
DeepSeek-V3 was released on 2024-12-25, while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct was released on 2024-12-06.
DeepSeek-V3 is 1 month newer than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.
Dec 25, 2024
1.8 years ago
2w newerDec 6, 2024
1.8 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
DeepSeek-V3 is available from DeepSeek, DeepInfra. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Lambda, Hyperbolic, Groq, Sambanova, Cerebras, Bedrock, Together, Fireworks.
DeepSeek-V3
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V3 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about DeepSeek-V3 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.