The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Devstral Medium

DeepSeek-V3.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3.1 is 1.8x cheaper per token.

DeepSeek · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V3.1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified), while Devstral Medium is better at 0 benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, DeepSeek-V3.1 is roughly 1.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

DeepSeek-V3.1 also accepts a larger context window (163,840 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V3.1

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 1.8x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 163,840 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Devstral Medium

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.27 / M
$0.40 / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
$2.00 / M
Context window
163,840
128,000
Released
Jan 2025
Jul 2025
License
MIT
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V3.1 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified), while Devstral Medium is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V3.1 costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V3.1 ($0.27/1M tokens) is 1.5x cheaper than Devstral Medium ($0.40/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V3.1 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than Devstral Medium ($2.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Devstral Medium is more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.1.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input tokens$0.27
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Mistral AI
Devstral Medium
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$2.00
Best providerMistral
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-V3.1 accepts 163,840 input tokens compared to Devstral Medium's 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek-V3.1 can generate longer responses up to 163,840 tokens, while Devstral Medium is limited to 128,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input163,840 tokens
Output163,840 tokens
Mistral AI
Devstral Medium
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V3.1 is licensed under MIT, while Devstral Medium uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V3.1

MIT

Open weights

Devstral Medium

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3.1 was released on 2025-01-10, while Devstral Medium was released on 2025-07-10.

Devstral Medium is 6 months newer than DeepSeek-V3.1.

DeepSeek-V3.1

Jan 10, 2025

1.6 years ago

Devstral Medium

Jul 10, 2025

1.1 years ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V3.1 is available from DeepInfra, Novita. Devstral Medium is available from Mistral AI.

DeepSeek-V3.1

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.27/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.27/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M

Devstral Medium

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V3.1 and Devstral Medium side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V3.1
✓ Preferred
Devstral Medium
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Devstral Medium.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V3.1 or Devstral Medium?

DeepSeek-V3.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3.1 is made by DeepSeek and Devstral Medium is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek-V3.1 compare to Devstral Medium in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V3.1 scores SimpleQA: 93.4%, MMLU-Redux: 91.8%, MMLU-Pro: 83.7%, GPQA: 74.9%, CodeForces: 69.7%. Devstral Medium scores SWE-Bench Verified: 61.6%.

Is DeepSeek-V3.1 cheaper than Devstral Medium?

DeepSeek-V3.1 is 1.5x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V3.1 costs $0.27/M input and $1.00/M output via deepinfra. Devstral Medium costs $0.40/M input and $2.00/M output via mistral.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V3.1 and Devstral Medium?

DeepSeek-V3.1 supports 164K tokens and Devstral Medium supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V3.1 and Devstral Medium?

Key differences include context window (164K vs 128K), input pricing ($0.27 vs $0.40/M), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V3.1 and Devstral Medium?

DeepSeek-V3.1 is developed by DeepSeek and Devstral Medium is developed by Mistral AI.