Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Gemma 3 27B

DeepSeek-V3.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 27B is 3.6x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V3.1 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench, MMLU-Pro, SimpleQA), while Gemma 3 27B is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3 27B costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V3.1 ($0.27/1M tokens) is 2.7x more expensive than Gemma 3 27B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V3.1 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than Gemma 3 27B ($0.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-V3.1 is more expensive than Gemma 3 27B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input tokens$0.27
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

644.0B diff

DeepSeek-V3.1 has 644.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 27B, making it 2385.2% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1
671.0Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3 27B
27.0Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek-V3.1
27.0B
Gemma 3 27B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-V3.1 accepts 163,840 input tokens compared to Gemma 3 27B's 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek-V3.1 can generate longer responses up to 163,840 tokens, while Gemma 3 27B is limited to 131,072 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input163,840 tokens
Output163,840 tokens
Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3.1 does not.

Gemma 3 27B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V3.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V3.1 is licensed under MIT, while Gemma 3 27B uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V3.1

MIT

Open weights

Gemma 3 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3.1 was released on 2025-01-10, while Gemma 3 27B was released on 2025-03-12.

Gemma 3 27B is 2 months newer than DeepSeek-V3.1.

DeepSeek-V3.1

Jan 10, 2025

1.4 years ago

Gemma 3 27B

Mar 12, 2025

1.2 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V3.1 is available from DeepInfra, Novita. Gemma 3 27B is available from DeepInfra, Novita.

DeepSeek-V3.1

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.27/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.27/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M

Gemma 3 27B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.11/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek
Larger context window (163,840 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (74.9% vs 42.4%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (56.4% vs 29.7%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (83.7% vs 67.5%)
Higher SimpleQA score (93.4% vs 10.0%)
Google
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1
Google
Gemma 3 27B

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Gemma 3 27B.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V3.1 or Gemma 3 27B?

DeepSeek-V3.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3.1 is made by DeepSeek and Gemma 3 27B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek-V3.1 compare to Gemma 3 27B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V3.1 scores SimpleQA: 93.4%, MMLU-Redux: 91.8%, MMLU-Pro: 83.7%, GPQA: 74.9%, CodeForces: 69.7%. Gemma 3 27B scores GSM8k: 95.9%, IFEval: 90.4%, MATH: 89.0%, HumanEval: 87.8%, BIG-Bench Hard: 87.6%.

Is DeepSeek-V3.1 cheaper than Gemma 3 27B?

Gemma 3 27B is 2.7x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V3.1 costs $0.27/M input and $1.00/M output via deepinfra. Gemma 3 27B costs $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V3.1 and Gemma 3 27B?

DeepSeek-V3.1 supports 164K tokens and Gemma 3 27B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V3.1 and Gemma 3 27B?

Key differences include context window (164K vs 131K), input pricing ($0.27 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V3.1 and Gemma 3 27B?

DeepSeek-V3.1 is developed by DeepSeek and Gemma 3 27B is developed by Google.