DeepSeek-V3.1 vs GLM-5 Comparison

Comparing DeepSeek-V3.1 and GLM-5 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V3.1 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GLM-5 is better at 2 benchmarks (BrowseComp, SWE-Bench Verified).

GLM-5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V3.1 costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V3.1 ($0.27/1M tokens) is 3.7x cheaper than GLM-5 ($1.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V3.1 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 3.2x cheaper than GLM-5 ($3.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5 is more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.1.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input tokens$0.27
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

73.0B diff

GLM-5 has 73.0B more parameters than DeepSeek-V3.1, making it 10.9% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1
671.0Bparameters
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
744.0Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek-V3.1
744.0B
GLM-5

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-5 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V3.1's 163,840 tokens. DeepSeek-V3.1 can generate longer responses up to 163,840 tokens, while GLM-5 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input163,840 tokens
Output163,840 tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

DeepSeek-V3.1

MIT

Open weights

GLM-5

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3.1 was released on 2025-01-10, while GLM-5 was released on 2026-02-11.

GLM-5 is 13 months newer than DeepSeek-V3.1.

DeepSeek-V3.1

Jan 10, 2025

1.2 years ago

GLM-5

Feb 11, 2026

1 months ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V3.1 is available from DeepInfra, Novita. GLM-5 is available from ZAI. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

DeepSeek-V3.1

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.27/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.27/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M

GLM-5

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher BrowseComp score (75.9% vs 30.0%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (77.8% vs 66.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1
Zhipu AI
GLM-5