Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3.1 is 1.1x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V3.1 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2024).

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V3.1 costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V3.1 ($0.27/1M tokens) is 1.9x cheaper than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct ($0.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V3.1 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct ($0.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.1.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input tokens$0.27
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerDeepinfra
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerReplicate
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

663.0B diff

DeepSeek-V3.1 has 663.0B more parameters than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct, making it 8287.5% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1
671.0Bparameters
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
8.0Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek-V3.1
8.0B
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-V3.1 accepts 163,840 input tokens compared to Granite 3.3 8B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek-V3.1 can generate longer responses up to 163,840 tokens, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is limited to 8,192 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input163,840 tokens
Output163,840 tokens
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3.1 does not.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V3.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V3.1 is licensed under MIT, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V3.1

MIT

Open weights

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3.1 was released on 2025-01-10, while Granite 3.3 8B Instruct was released on 2025-04-16.

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is 3 months newer than DeepSeek-V3.1.

DeepSeek-V3.1

Jan 10, 2025

1.4 years ago

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 16, 2025

1.1 years ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while DeepSeek-V3.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Granite 3.3 8B Instruct's training data extends to 2024-04-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V3.1's cutoff date.

DeepSeek-V3.1

—

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

Apr 2024

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V3.1 is available from DeepInfra, Novita. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is available from Replicate.

DeepSeek-V3.1

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.27/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.27/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

replicate logo
Replicate
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek
Larger context window (163,840 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
IBM
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive output tokens
Higher AIME 2024 score (81.2% vs 66.3%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V3.1 or Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

Granite 3.3 8B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3.1 is made by DeepSeek and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek-V3.1 compare to Granite 3.3 8B Instruct in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V3.1 scores SimpleQA: 93.4%, MMLU-Redux: 91.8%, MMLU-Pro: 83.7%, GPQA: 74.9%, CodeForces: 69.7%. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, GSM8k: 80.9%.

Is DeepSeek-V3.1 cheaper than Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

DeepSeek-V3.1 is 1.9x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V3.1 costs $0.27/M input and $1.00/M output via deepinfra. Granite 3.3 8B Instruct costs $0.50/M input and $0.50/M output via replicate.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V3.1 and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

DeepSeek-V3.1 supports 164K tokens and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V3.1 and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

Key differences include context window (164K vs 128K), input pricing ($0.27 vs $0.50/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V3.1 and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct?

DeepSeek-V3.1 is developed by DeepSeek and Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is developed by IBM.