Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Grok-4 Heavy

Grok-4 Heavy significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V3.1 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Grok-4 Heavy is better at 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, LiveCodeBench).

Grok-4 Heavy significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input tokens$0.27
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerDeepinfra
xAI
Grok-4 Heavy
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-V3.1 specifies input context (163,840 tokens). Only DeepSeek-V3.1 specifies output context (163,840 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input163,840 tokens
Output163,840 tokens
xAI
Grok-4 Heavy
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Grok-4 Heavy supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3.1 does not.

Grok-4 Heavy can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V3.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-4 Heavy

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V3.1 is licensed under MIT, while Grok-4 Heavy uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V3.1

MIT

Open weights

Grok-4 Heavy

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3.1 was released on 2025-01-10, while Grok-4 Heavy's release date is not specified.

We can confirm DeepSeek-V3.1's release timeline, but cannot make a direct age comparison without Grok-4 Heavy's release date.

DeepSeek-V3.1

Jan 10, 2025

1.3 years ago

Grok-4 Heavy

—

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok-4 Heavy has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-31, while DeepSeek-V3.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok-4 Heavy's training data extends to 2024-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V3.1's cutoff date.

DeepSeek-V3.1

—

Grok-4 Heavy

Dec 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek
Larger context window (163,840 tokens)
Has open weights
xAI
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2025 score (100.0% vs 49.8%)
Higher GPQA score (88.4% vs 74.9%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (50.7% vs 15.9%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (79.4% vs 56.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1
xAI
Grok-4 Heavy

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Grok-4 Heavy

Grok-4 Heavy significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3.1 is made by DeepSeek and Grok-4 Heavy is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
DeepSeek-V3.1 scores SimpleQA: 93.4%, MMLU-Redux: 91.8%, MMLU-Pro: 83.7%, GPQA: 74.9%, CodeForces: 69.7%. Grok-4 Heavy scores AIME 2025: 100.0%, HMMT25: 96.7%, GPQA: 88.4%, LiveCodeBench: 79.4%, USAMO25: 61.9%.
DeepSeek-V3.1 supports 164K tokens and Grok-4 Heavy supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
DeepSeek-V3.1 is developed by DeepSeek and Grok-4 Heavy is developed by xAI.