Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

DeepSeek-V3.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V3.1 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA), while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Apr 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Apr 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input tokens$0.27
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerDeepinfra
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

663.0B diff

DeepSeek-V3.1 has 663.0B more parameters than Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1, making it 8287.5% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1
671.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
8.0Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek-V3.1
8.0B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-V3.1 specifies input context (163,840 tokens). Only DeepSeek-V3.1 specifies output context (163,840 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input163,840 tokens
Output163,840 tokens
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Apr 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V3.1 is licensed under MIT, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 uses Llama 3.1 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V3.1

MIT

Open weights

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3.1 was released on 2025-01-10, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 was released on 2025-03-18.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is 2 months newer than DeepSeek-V3.1.

DeepSeek-V3.1

Jan 10, 2025

1.3 years ago

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Mar 18, 2025

1.1 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while DeepSeek-V3.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V3.1's cutoff date.

DeepSeek-V3.1

—

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

Dec 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek
Larger context window (163,840 tokens)
Higher AIME 2025 score (49.8% vs 47.1%)
Higher GPQA score (74.9% vs 54.1%)
NVIDIA

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

DeepSeek-V3.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3.1 is made by DeepSeek and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
DeepSeek-V3.1 scores SimpleQA: 93.4%, MMLU-Redux: 91.8%, MMLU-Pro: 83.7%, GPQA: 74.9%, CodeForces: 69.7%. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 scores MATH-500: 95.4%, MBPP: 84.6%, MT-Bench: 81.0%, IFEval: 79.3%, BFCL v2: 63.6%.
DeepSeek-V3.1 supports 164K tokens and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (MIT vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
DeepSeek-V3.1 is developed by DeepSeek and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is developed by NVIDIA.