DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs GPT-4.1 mini
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads the LLM Stats Score 28.5 to 14.2. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is 2.3x cheaper per token.
DeepSeek · OpenAI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads the overall LLM Stats Score 28.5 to 14.2, ranking #125 overall.
In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp wins 6; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is roughly 2.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
GPT-4.1 mini also accepts a larger context window (1,047,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
- overall performance matters — it scores 28.5 and ranks #125 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 6 of 6 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 2.3x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose GPT-4.1 mini
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,047,576 token context window
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
14 reported for DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp · 28 for GPT-4.1 mini
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp outperforms in 6 benchmarks (Aider-Polyglot, AIME 2025, GPQA, HMMT 2025, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified), while GPT-4.1 mini is better at 0 benchmarks.
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp ($0.27/1M tokens) is 1.5x cheaper than GPT-4.1 mini ($0.40/1M tokens).
For output processing, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp ($0.41/1M tokens) is 3.9x cheaper than GPT-4.1 mini ($1.60/1M tokens).
In conclusion, GPT-4.1 mini is more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
GPT-4.1 mini accepts 1,047,576 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp's 163,840 tokens. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp can generate longer responses up to 65,536 tokens, while GPT-4.1 mini is limited to 32,768 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
GPT-4.1 mini supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp does not.
GPT-4.1 mini can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
GPT-4.1 mini
License
Usage and distribution terms
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is licensed under MIT, while GPT-4.1 mini uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp was released on 2025-09-29, while GPT-4.1 mini was released on 2025-04-14.
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is 6 months newer than GPT-4.1 mini.
Sep 29, 2025
11 months ago
5mo newerApr 14, 2025
1.4 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
GPT-4.1 mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm GPT-4.1 mini's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp's cutoff date.
—
May 2024
Provider Availability
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is available from Novita. GPT-4.1 mini is available from OpenAI.
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
GPT-4.1 mini
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and GPT-4.1 mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs GPT-4.1 mini.