The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 33.9. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is 1.0x cheaper per token.

DeepSeek · DeepSeek · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 33.9, ranking #13 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,040,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.28/M input and $0.42/M output

Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.8 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,040,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
DeepSeek
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
33.9
#96
51.8
#13
Reasoning
32.5
#103
48.9
#18
Coding
18.6
#111
44.2
#5
Agents
10.9
#113
41.1
#4
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
$0.28 / M
$0.22 / M
Output price
$0.42 / M
$0.66 / M
Context window
131,072
1,040,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Math
34.2#49
35.2#43
Tool use
10.4#125
34.8#2
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

8 reported for DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale · 20 for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

2 shared

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is better at 2 benchmarks (CodeForces, Humanity's Last Exam).

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale ($0.28/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash ($0.22/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale ($0.42/1M tokens) is 1.6x cheaper than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash ($0.66/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$0.42
Best providerDeepSeek
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Input tokens$0.22
Output tokens$0.66
Best providerFireworks
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

78.2B diff

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash has 78.2B more parameters than DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale, making it 11.4% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
685.0Bparameters
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
763.2Bparameters
685.0B
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
763.2B
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash accepts 1,040,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale's 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash can generate longer responses up to 393,216 tokens, while DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is limited to 131,072 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Input1,040,000 tokens
Output393,216 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale does not.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

MIT

Open weights

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale was released on 2025-12-01, while DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash was released on 2026-09-10.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is 9 months newer than DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

Dec 1, 2025

9 months ago

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Sep 10, 2026

1 weeks ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is available from DeepSeek. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is available from Fireworks, DeepInfra, DeepSeek, Novita.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.42/1M

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.22/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.66/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
✓ Preferred
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 33.9. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is made by DeepSeek and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale compare to DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores HMMT 2025: 99.2%, AIME 2025: 96.0%, CodeForces: 90.0%, t2-bench: 80.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 73.1%. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash scores CodeForces: 100.0%, GPQA: 90.9%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 90.6%, BabyVision: 89.6%, CyberGym: 88.1%.

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale cheaper than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is 1.3x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale costs $0.28/M input and $0.42/M output via deepseek. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash costs $0.22/M input and $0.66/M output via fireworks.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale supports 131K tokens and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (33.9 vs 51.8), context window (131K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.28 vs $0.22/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons