Model Comparison

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17BWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is 4.3x cheaper per token.

Verdict: DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B — which is better?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale (by DeepSeek) and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale outperforms in 2 benchmarks (HMMT 2025, Humanity's Last Exam), while Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is better at 4 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified, t2-bench, Terminal-Bench 2.0, Toolathlon). Qwen3.5-397B-A17B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

On price, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is roughly 4.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale if…

  • cost matters — it's about 4.3x cheaper per token

Choose Qwen3.5-397B-A17B if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 6 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale outperforms in 2 benchmarks (HMMT 2025, Humanity's Last Exam), while Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is better at 4 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified, t2-bench, Terminal-Bench 2.0, Toolathlon).

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Jul 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale ($0.28/1M tokens) is 2.1x cheaper than Qwen3.5-397B-A17B ($0.60/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale ($0.42/1M tokens) is 8.6x cheaper than Qwen3.5-397B-A17B ($3.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Jul 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$0.42
Best providerDeepSeek
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Input tokens$0.60
Output tokens$3.60
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

288.0B diff

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 288.0B more parameters than Qwen3.5-397B-A17B, making it 72.5% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
685.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
397.0Bparameters
685.0B
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
397.0B
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale's 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is limited to 64,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Input262,144 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Tue Jul 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale does not.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3.5-397B-A17B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale was released on 2025-12-01, while Qwen3.5-397B-A17B was released on 2026-02-16.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is 3 months newer than DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

Dec 1, 2025

7 months ago

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Feb 16, 2026

5 months ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is available from DeepSeek. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is available from Novita.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.42/1M

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher HMMT 2025 score (99.2% vs 94.8%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (30.6% vs 28.7%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (76.4% vs 73.1%)
Higher t2-bench score (86.7% vs 80.3%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (52.5% vs 46.4%)
Higher Toolathlon score (38.3% vs 35.2%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is made by DeepSeek and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale compare to Qwen3.5-397B-A17B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores HMMT 2025: 99.2%, AIME 2025: 96.0%, CodeForces: 90.0%, t2-bench: 80.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 73.1%. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B scores MMLU-Redux: 94.9%, HMMT 2025: 94.8%, C-Eval: 93.0%, HMMT25: 92.7%, IFEval: 92.6%.

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale cheaper than Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is 2.1x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale costs $0.28/M input and $0.42/M output via deepseek. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B costs $0.60/M input and $3.60/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale supports 131K tokens and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?

Key differences include context window (131K vs 262K), input pricing ($0.28 vs $0.60/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is developed by DeepSeek and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.